![]() |
![]() |
|
Click the comments link on any story to see comments or add your own. |
09 May 2007
Forwarding e-mail is so easy that it must be legal, right? Not everyone thinks so. Ned Snow at the University of Arkansas recently wrote A Copyright Conundrum: Protecting Email Privacy that argues that forwarding violates the sender's copyright rights, so it's not. The article is quite clever and is (as best I can tell, not being a legal historian) well researched, even if you agree with me that its conclusions are a bunch of codswallop.posted at: 17:15 :: permanent link to this entry :: 1 comments Trackback link is http://weblog.johnlevine.com./Copyright_Law/snow.trackback 19 Mar 2006
posted at: 14:04 :: permanent link to this entry :: 0 comments Trackback link is http://weblog.johnlevine.com./Copyright_Law/googleparker.trackback 30 Jan 2006
In a widely noted decision, a Nevada judge has handed down a ruling in favor of Google in a case in which attorney Blake Field sued Google for copyright infringement due to Google's web page cache keeping copies of his material. Read comments by the EFF, Red Herring, and Larry Lessig's blog. I am Google's technical expert in the case, and as you might expect, I am pleased that the judge found our position, including my report and declaration, so persuasive. posted at: 02:25 :: permanent link to this entry :: 0 comments Trackback link is http://weblog.johnlevine.com./Copyright_Law/field.trackback 16 Nov 2005
The Knowledge@Wharton newsletter published by the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania has an interesting article on the Google Print cases. Professor Kevin Werbach offers a fine capsule summary of the case: "Google is clearly going out on a limb with respect to copyright. The limb may well hold, which I think would be the better result as a matter of public policy. On the other hand, the limb could easily break. The courts will decide." They also excerpt an interview with Pat Schroder, president of the AAP which filed the second case: "snippet" isn't a legal term and could evolve from meaning a sentence to meaning a complete chapter. I read that to say that what Google is doing is OK, and even though there's no evidence that they plan to do anything else, we need to stop them just because of what they might do. I hope the judge has enough sense to recognize a cloud of smoke when he or she sees it. posted at: 22:36 :: permanent link to this entry :: 0 comments Trackback link is http://weblog.johnlevine.com./Copyright_Law/wharton.trackback 06 Nov 2005
An article in CNET reports that Google hasn't resumed scanning library books. They say it's ``an operational thing'' and confirm that when they do resume, they'll be scanning older books rather than those that are still in print. posted at: 23:41 :: permanent link to this entry :: 0 comments Trackback link is http://weblog.johnlevine.com./Copyright_Law/googlenotresume.trackback |
Topics
My other sitesOther blogsWord
to the Wise
Related sitesCoalition Against Unsolicited Commercial E-mail
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2005-2008 John R. Levine.
CAN SPAM address harvesting notice: the operator of this website will
not give, sell, or otherwise transfer addresses maintained by this
website to any other party for the purposes of initiating, or enabling
others to initiate, electronic mail messages.